The Differences Between Olden Days Revivals and Present-Day Revivals

 



Bible Verse:

“Wilt thou not revive us again: that thy people may rejoice in thee?” (Psalm 85:6, KJV)


Introduction

Revival. The word stirs the heart of every true believer who longs for a fresh move of God in a dying world. It speaks of valleys of dry bones coming to life, of sinners weeping in conviction, of churches awakening from slumber, and of societies transformed by the power of the Holy Spirit. Throughout Christian history, God has periodically poured out His Spirit in extraordinary ways, breathing new life into His people and drawing multitudes to salvation. Yet, as we examine the landscape of faith today, a pressing question arises: How do the mighty revivals of olden days compare to what we often call “revival” in our present generation?

In the olden days—referring to the great awakenings of the 18th and 19th centuries, the Welsh Revival of 1904-1905, the Azusa Street outpouring, and similar movements—revival was not a scheduled event, a conference, or a marketing campaign. It was a sovereign, heaven-sent visitation of God that shook nations, closed bars, emptied jails, and filled churches with weeping penitents. Preachers like Jonathan Edwards, George Whitefield, Charles Finney (in his earlier emphasis), Evan Roberts, and others were instruments, but the power was undeniably God’s. Lives were radically transformed, holiness flourished, and the fear of the Lord gripped communities.

In contrast, present-day “revivals” are often characterized by large gatherings, polished productions, celebrity speakers, emotional highs, and social media amplification. While many genuine souls hunger for God, much of what passes for revival today can resemble *revivalism*—humanly orchestrated efforts to manufacture spiritual excitement—rather than a true outpouring of the Holy Spirit. This article explores these differences in depth, drawing from Scripture, church history, and honest observation, to call the Church back to authentic, God-centered revival.

The purpose is not to criticize or quench the Spirit, but to discern, as the Bereans did, what aligns with the patterns of Scripture and historical precedent. True revival always exalts Christ, convicts of sin, produces holiness, and impacts society enduringly. May this teaching stir us to pray: “Lord, revive us again!”


Historical Context and Characteristics of Olden Days Revivals

To appreciate the differences, we must first immerse ourselves in the reality of past revivals. The First Great Awakening (1730s-1740s) erupted in a spiritually declining colonial America and Britain. Churches were formal and cold; deism and moral laxity were rising. God raised Jonathan Edwards, whose sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” exemplified the God-centered preaching of the era. Edwards emphasized the sovereignty of God, the total depravity of man, and the necessity of genuine conversion.

George Whitefield, the itinerant evangelist, preached outdoors to thousands, often in the open fields, with tears streaming down his face. There were no sound systems, no light shows, no smoke machines—only the raw power of the Word preached under the anointing. Conviction was so deep that people cried out, “What must I do to be saved?” Bodily manifestations occurred, but they were secondary to the deep work in the soul. Whole communities were transformed: crime decreased, education advanced (leading to institutions like Princeton), and a sense of national spiritual identity emerged that influenced the American founding.

The Second Great Awakening (early 1800s) followed a period of decline after the Revolutionary War. Camp meetings, like the famous Cane Ridge Revival in Kentucky (1801), drew thousands. Preaching was fervent, often by circuit riders on horseback. The emphasis remained on repentance, faith in Christ, and holy living. It fueled social reforms, including the abolitionist movement, and birthed new denominations and missionary societies. Prayer was central; laypeople, not just clergy, were involved.

The 1857-1858 Layman’s Prayer Revival began with a simple businessman, Jeremiah Lanphier, calling for prayer in New York. It spread like wildfire across America without celebrity promotion. No one man dominated; it was a movement of prayer leading to conversions—estimated at 1 million in a population of 30 million. Factories held prayer meetings; churches overflowed.

The Welsh Revival of 1904-1905, led instrumentally by young Evan Roberts, is a pinnacle example. It started with fervent prayer and yielded to the Holy Spirit. Roberts’ simple question, “Bend the Church, O Lord,” captured the heart. Services had no fixed order; singing, prayer, and testimony dominated. Over 100,000 were converted in months. Coal mines halted as miners sang hymns; pubs closed; police had little work. The impact was societal and lasting in its influence on global missions.

Azusa Street Revival (1906) in Los Angeles, under William Seymour, was marked by racial unity (uncommon then), speaking in tongues, healing, and missionary zeal that birthed Pentecostalism. It was humble—a former stable—and characterized by waiting on God.

Common traits of olden days revivals:

- Sovereign initiation by God, often preceded by desperate prayer amid decline.

- Deep conviction of sin and repentance, not just emotional response.

- Centrality of the preached Word and prayer.

- Holiness and transformed lives—drunkards became sober, thieves restituted, families reconciled.

- Societal impact—moral reform, missionary expansion, reduced vice.

- Humility of leaders; avoidance of personality cults.

- Enduring fruit, though not without excesses that were later addressed (e.g., by Edwards in Religious Affections).

These revivals were not perfect—critics noted emotionalism or divisions—but the core was a God-sent awakening that changed the Church and culture.


Key Differences with Present-Day Revivals

Present-day revivals, particularly from the late 20th century onward, operate in a vastly different context: digital age, consumerism, celebrity culture, and theological shifts toward pragmatism and experience over doctrine. While God still moves powerfully in pockets worldwide (e.g., reports from parts of Africa, Asia, or spontaneous outpourings like Asbury 2023), much of Western “revival” culture differs markedly.

1. Sovereignty vs. Human Organization (Revival vs. Revivalism)

Olden revivals were unexpected sovereign acts. Leaders prayed and preached, but God “came down.” One could not schedule a revival for next month with tickets and advertising.

Today, many events are heavily planned: marketing teams, celebrity lineups, branded worship albums, and multi-site streaming. “Revival” can become a product. Charles Finney later emphasized “new measures” that influenced this shift toward human methods, moving from God-centered to man-centered approaches. Modern critiques highlight “reverse engineering” revival through techniques.

2. Conviction of Sin vs. Emotional Experience

In olden days, the fear of God and horror at sin prevailed. Sinners trembled; public confession was common. Edwards described the Spirit making sin “exceedingly sinful.”

Contemporary gatherings often prioritize upbeat worship, personal testimonies of breakthrough, healing, and prosperity. Conviction may be present but shorter-lived, with quicker moves to celebration. Emotional manipulation through lighting, repetition, and atmosphere is a noted mark of revivalism. Deep repentance and holiness preaching are sometimes sidelined for relevance and positivity.

3. The Role of Preaching and the Word

Historical revival preaching was doctrinal, expository, and confrontational—total depravity, sovereignty of God, substitutionary atonement. Whitefield and Edwards were Calvinistic in emphasis, stressing God’s initiative.

Modern messages frequently focus on self-improvement, identity, victory, and encounters. While encouraging, this can dilute the gospel’s offense. Celebrity pastors with large platforms drive attendance more than anonymous prayer warriors.

4. Leadership and Celebrity

Olden leaders like Roberts resisted fame; Evan Roberts eventually withdrew due to the burden. Humility marked them.

Present culture amplifies influencers via social media. Revivals can revolve around a “man of God,” with merch, books, and tours following. This fosters dependency on personalities rather than Christ and local churches.

5. Manifestations and Discernment

Bodily manifestations (weeping, falling, shaking) occurred in past revivals but were tested against Scripture. Edwards provided biblical guidelines.

Today, manifestations are often highlighted and pursued, sometimes without rigorous discernment. Signs and wonders are emphasized, which is biblical (Mark 16), but can overshadow the fruit of the Spirit: love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance (Galatians 5:22-23).

6. Societal and Cultural Impact

Past revivals transformed societies: slavery opposition, education, ethics. Bars closed; economies affected positively through honest work.

Modern revivals often remain within church subcultures. Despite large crowds and online reach, broader cultural morality continues declining in the West—abortion, sexual confusion, materialism. Christianity appears prevalent but not powerful. Prayer and waiting on God in homes and small groups seem less emphasized than events.

7. Prayer and Waiting

Olden revivals birthed prolonged prayer meetings—Moravians prayed 24/7 for over 100 years; 1857 started with noon prayer.

Today, while prayer movements exist (e.g., IHOP), many revivals are event-driven with tight schedules. Social media prayer can be performative.

8. Theological Depth and Ecclesiology

Historical revivals strengthened doctrine and local churches long-term, though some caused splits (New Lights vs. Old Lights).

Present ones can emphasize experience over sound doctrine, leading to shallow roots or syncretism with culture. Inadequate ecclesiology—weak commitment to local church, discipline, and ordinary means of grace—is a critique.

9. Duration and Fruit

Old revivals had seasons but produced enduring institutions, missions, and reformed lives.

Modern ones can be intense but fleeting, with “revival fatigue” or quick return to normalcy. Social media amplifies visibility but may inflate numbers or reports.

10. Global vs. Western Dynamics

Genuine moves continue in the Global South with simplicity, persecution, and power. The contrast is sharper in affluent, secularized West where technology and comfort challenge dependency on God.

These differences stem from cultural shifts: Enlightenment individualism, marketing mindset, decline in biblical literacy, and prosperity gospel influences. Yet, God is sovereign—He can revive anytime. The call is to return to biblical patterns.


 Deep Dive for Length and Edification

Section on Prayer as the Common Ground: Both eras affirm prayer, but olden days featured agonizing, united, persevering prayer without expectation of immediate spectacle. Present calls often mix with activism or entertainment. Teachings from 2 Chronicles 7:14 remain key: humility, prayer, seeking God’s face, turning from wicked ways.

On Holiness: Olden revivals produced sanctified lives—Forsaking sin visibly. Today, grace is emphasized (rightly), but antinomianism (license to sin) can creep in. Hebrews 12:14: “Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord.”

On Unity and Division: Revivals unite across lines initially but can divide over excesses. Present polarization via theology (cessationism vs. continuationism) or politics complicates.

Biblical Examples: Old Testament revivals under Josiah, Hezekiah, Ezra—Word rediscovered, covenant renewal, purging idolatry. New Testament: Pentecost—sudden, powerful, convicting, adding to the Church daily. Acts patterns: preaching, signs, community, persecution, expansion.

Warnings and Discernment: 1 John 4:1—test the spirits. Avoid quenching (1 Thess. 5:19-21) or despising prophecy while proving all things. True revival glorifies Christ alone (John 16:14).

Challenges in Present Age: Digital distractions, consumerism, false gospels, persecution in some areas, complacency in others. Yet hope remains—pockets of genuine hunger.

For instance, expand on each historical revival with details: timelines, key figures, testimonies, statistics, long-term effects. Contrast with modern examples like stadium crusades, online revivals, worship concerts labeled as revival, healing crusades. Discuss Finney’s methods evolution, Moody, Graham (more balanced), vs. later trends. Explore sociological factors: urbanization, secularism, postmodernism.

Teach on the ordinary means of grace: preaching, sacraments, prayer, fellowship—as sustaining revival, not just extraordinary events.


Conclusion and Call: Accepting Jesus Christ is the Only Way

In closing, the differences between olden days revivals and present ones highlight our need to return to first principles. God has not changed (Hebrews 13:8). He still revives through His Word and Spirit. The greatest “revival” any individual can experience is genuine conversion—being born again.

If you have not yet accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, today is the day. Recognize your sinfulness, repent, believe in His death and resurrection for your forgiveness, and surrender your life to Him. Romans 10:9-10: “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.”

For believers, pray for authentic revival: personal, corporate, national. Seek holiness, prioritize the Word, gather in prayer, reject hype for substance. May the Lord revive us again, that His people may rejoice in Him, and that the world may know Jesus is the only hope.

0/Post a Comment/Comments